GRE Topic
People always have a few secrets that we do
not want to share publicly because of different reasons. Some secrets are closely
related to our private life; some are too embarrassing to mention. However, we
are curious and we are eager to reveal all the confidential and well-hidden
secrets to the world. In the modern world, terrifying and shameful secrets are
more likely to be reported on social media since the audiences prefer to listen
to these shocking scandals, which may ruin their privacy. As a result, some say
that scandal is the best methodology to attract people’s attention on a
specific topic, as everyone is fond of viewing disclosed scandals and discussing
the seriousness behind them. I personally believe this statement is not accurate
because such statement fails to observe this phenomenon in a long-term perspective
and neglects to analyze the significance of revealing scandals.
Nowadays, scandals are most likely to be
addressed as negative news about celebrities or corporations. The strength of
scandals is significant and effectiveness that they can reverse one’s
reputation to a rotten state in a blink of time. As a result, scandals become
an effective and favorable strategy to tackle your opponent. During the former election
of California governor, the former Mayor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, was reported
to have engaged in sexual harassment against a co-worker several times. These
scandals rapidly deteriorated the reputation of the candidate and several
women-rights groups raised their voice to oppose the campaign. However, the
scandals twist and distort the idea of election. The ideal situation is to vote
for the most suitable candidate that can improve the state’s social and financial
performance in order to improve the general public’s living standard. However,
strategies involving scandals distort the idea of election to vote for the
person who has the least-scandals. These attacks do not focus on the policy
direction and future implementation but the past history. I believe that
scandals that revealing one’s past is less significant compared to the
potential ability one has.
The statement may not be accurate in that
most of the scandals do not relate to the important issues the world is
experiencing at the moment. This is because the audiences are interested in
reading scandals that are related to the person that they are familiar with,
celebrities. Scandals that happened outside the country are considered
tasteless because the audiences are not able to attach themselves in the
situation. As a result, if you walk in a North American supermarket, the
observation may shock you. Racks of magazines that writes about the Royal
Family’s private life and Kate and William overwhelms the cashier. However,
emergency topic such as Ebola and Global Warming which can potentially harm one’s
survival never occur on the racks. These scandals mislead the reader to focus
on minor problems and blur the sight of global issues. More importantly, these
scandals spawns rapidly that the readers are bombardment with massive
information. The latest scandals can easily overlap the previous one so each of
the scandal does not last longer than a week.